Εμφάνιση αναρτήσεων με ετικέτα bill. Εμφάνιση όλων των αναρτήσεων
Εμφάνιση αναρτήσεων με ετικέτα bill. Εμφάνιση όλων των αναρτήσεων

Παρασκευή 5 Απριλίου 2013

ACLU: Unhappy with Background Checks in Potential Reid Gun Control Bill


The ACLU talks some sense about gun control, civil liberties,
and privacy, as
reported by Daily Caller
:




As Senate Democrats struggle to build support for new gun
control legislation, the American Civil Liberties Union now says
it’s among those who have “serious concerns” about the
bill....


In an exclusive interview with The Daily Caller, a top lobbyist
for the ACLU announced that the group thinks Reid’s current gun
bill could threaten both privacy rights and civil liberties.


The inclusion of universal background checks — the poll-tested
lynchpin of most Democratic proposals — “raises two significant
concerns,” the ACLU’s Chris Calabrese told TheDC Wednesday.



While not against background checks in all cases, Calabrese
says:



“However, we also believe those checks have to be conducted in a
way that protects privacy and civil liberties. So, in that regard,
we think the current legislation, the current proposal on
universal background checks raises two significant concerns,” he
went on.


“The first is that it treats the records for private purchases
very differently than purchases made through licensed sellers.
Under existing law, most information regarding an
approved purchase is destroyed within 24 hours when a licensed
seller does a [National Instant Criminal Background Check System]
check now,” Calabrese said, “and almost all of it is destroyed
within 90 days.”


Calabrese wouldn’t characterize the current legislation’s
record-keeping provision as a “national gun registry” — which the
White House has denied pursuing — but he did say that such a
registry could be “a second step.”



He notes that government databases sometimes stretch in use
beyond their original intent.



Calabrese says that [Nevada Democratic Senate leader Harry]
Reid’s legislation fails to include...“privacy best practices.”


“Contrast this with what the existing [Reid] legislation says,
which is simply that a record has to be kept of a private
transfer,” Calabrese highlighted, “and it doesn’t have any of the
protections that we have in current law
for existing licensees.”


“We think that that kind of record-keeping requirement could
result in keeping long-term detailed records of purchases and
creation of a new government database.”


“And they come to use databases for all sorts of
different purposes,” Calabrese said. “For example, the
National Counterterrorism Center recently gave itself the
authority to collect all kinds of existing federal databases
and performed terrorism related searches regarding those databases.
They essentially exempted themselves from a lot of existing Privacy
Act protections.”....


Reid’s legislation is hauntingly vague about who would
physically keep information about American gun purchases, but it’s
crystal clear that records will be kept.



While I'd rather the ACLU consistently take on gun laws head-on
as restrictions on an explicit constitutional civil liberty, it's
nice to see they care.

Πέμπτη 4 Απριλίου 2013

North Carolina House Speaker Kills Bill To Create State Religion

The Republican speaker of the North Carolina House of Representatives killed legislation on Thursday that aimed to establish an official state religion.

House Speaker Thom Tillis (R-Charlotte) announced Thursday afternoon that the bill would not be receiving a vote in the full House, effectively dropping the measure. Loretta Boniti, a reporter for News 14 Carolina, broke the news on Twitter, and it was confirmed in a breaking news alert posted on the home page of wral.com, a Raleigh-based television station. Tillis' decision followed several days of national media attention on the bill, which also said that the state government did not have to listen to federal court rulings and was exempt from the requirements of the First Amendment.

The bill, which was drafted by state Reps. Carl Ford (R-China Grove) and Harry Warren (R-Salisbury), was intended to address an issue in Rowan County, where the ACLU has filed a lawsuit against the county commission in an attempt to block commissioners from having a Christian prayer at the beginning of meetings.


Read More...
More on Religion and Politics


raw_feed?d=yIl2AUoC8zA raw_feed?i=dqjsNyEfMmM:4HUn3Sf_QCo:F7zBn raw_feed?i=dqjsNyEfMmM:4HUn3Sf_QCo:V_sGL
dqjsNyEfMmM

ACLU: Unhappy with Background Checks in Potential Reid Gun Control Bill


The ACLU talks some sense about gun control, civil liberties,
and privacy, as
reported by Daily Caller
:




As Senate Democrats struggle to build support for new gun
control legislation, the American Civil Liberties Union now says
it’s among those who have “serious concerns” about the
bill....


In an exclusive interview with The Daily Caller, a top lobbyist
for the ACLU announced that the group thinks Reid’s current gun
bill could threaten both privacy rights and civil liberties.


The inclusion of universal background checks — the poll-tested
lynchpin of most Democratic proposals — “raises two significant
concerns,” the ACLU’s Chris Calabrese told TheDC Wednesday.



While not against background checks in all cases, Calabrese
says:



“However, we also believe those checks have to be conducted in a
way that protects privacy and civil liberties. So, in that regard,
we think the current legislation, the current proposal on
universal background checks raises two significant concerns,” he
went on.


“The first is that it treats the records for private purchases
very differently than purchases made through licensed sellers.
Under existing law, most information regarding an
approved purchase is destroyed within 24 hours when a licensed
seller does a [National Instant Criminal Background Check System]
check now,” Calabrese said, “and almost all of it is destroyed
within 90 days.”


Calabrese wouldn’t characterize the current legislation’s
record-keeping provision as a “national gun registry” — which the
White House has denied pursuing — but he did say that such a
registry could be “a second step.”



He notes that government databases sometimes stretch in use
beyond their original intent.



Calabrese says that [Nevada Democratic Senate leader Harry]
Reid’s legislation fails to include...“privacy best practices.”


“Contrast this with what the existing [Reid] legislation says,
which is simply that a record has to be kept of a private
transfer,” Calabrese highlighted, “and it doesn’t have any of the
protections that we have in current law
for existing licensees.”


“We think that that kind of record-keeping requirement could
result in keeping long-term detailed records of purchases and
creation of a new government database.”


“And they come to use databases for all sorts of
different purposes,” Calabrese said. “For example, the
National Counterterrorism Center recently gave itself the
authority to collect all kinds of existing federal databases
and performed terrorism related searches regarding those databases.
They essentially exempted themselves from a lot of existing Privacy
Act protections.”....


Reid’s legislation is hauntingly vague about who would
physically keep information about American gun purchases, but it’s
crystal clear that records will be kept.



While I'd rather the ACLU consistently take on gun laws head-on
as restrictions on an explicit constitutional civil liberty, it's
nice to see they care.

Τετάρτη 3 Απριλίου 2013

Covered at Reason 24/7: ACLU Strategist Praises Rhode Island Domestic Drone Bill


Allie Bohm of
the ACLU has praised the domestic drone bill being considered by
legislators in Rhode Island. The bill requires public
accountability for the use of drones by law enforcement officials,
that UAVs not be equipped with weapons, and a ban on data
retention. 


From
The Atlantic
:



As anxiety about domestic drone use continues to mount, at least
30 states are weighing new laws that would regulate them. A Rhode
Island proposal is among the best, according
to Allie Bohm
 at the ACLU. Unlike her, I haven't read
every bill introduced by a state legislature. But I have read the
bill The Ocean State is mulling, and many of its provisions
desserve wider attention. I'd be thrilled if something with this
many civil liberties protections was actually passed and
enforced.



Follow this story and more at Reason 24/7.


If you have a story that would be of interest to Reason's
readers please let us know by emailing the 24/7 crew at
24_7@reason.com, or tweet us stories at @reason247.

Τετάρτη 27 Μαρτίου 2013

Kentucky Legislature Passes Hemp Bill, Rand Paul Vows Support From D.C.


The Kentucky Senate joined the House in

approving a hemp regulation bill last night
. This morning, Sen.
Rand Paul (R-Ky.) released a statement applauding the bill's
passage and promising to continue to push for a federal waiver from
the Controlled Substances Act for future Kentucky hemp growers:



“I commend the Kentucky General Assembly for final passage of
Senate Bill 50. I want to thank Kentucky Commissioner of
Agriculture James Comer, Senate Agriculture Committee Chairman Paul
Hornback and the members of the Kentucky Industrial Hemp Commission
for their leadership and hard work in passing this legislation,”
Sen. Paul said.


“Senate Bill 50 is an important step forward in the
reintroduction of industrial hemp in Kentucky. I have pledged,
along with Rep. John Yarmuth, to seek a waiver when a regulatory
framework is in place. I will follow through on that pledge and I
hope that Kentucky will soon start growing hemp, creating jobs and
leading the nation in this industry again.”



Earlier this month, libertarian activist Matt Hurtt
wrote for Reason
about Kentucky's push for industrial hemp
legalization, and the support role Paul and Sen. Mitch McConnell
are playing at the federal level.