Εμφάνιση αναρτήσεων με ετικέτα dont. Εμφάνιση όλων των αναρτήσεων
Εμφάνιση αναρτήσεων με ετικέτα dont. Εμφάνιση όλων των αναρτήσεων

Πέμπτη 4 Απριλίου 2013

Don't Expect Anything New In Obama's 2014 Budget Proposal

Barack ObamaOn April 10, President Obama will enter the ongoing 2014 budget battle when the White House releases its budget blueprint, joining Senate Democrats and both parties in the House in a partisan scuffle over the nation’s fiscal future.

If it’s anything like what the president put forth last year, the Medicare-related parts of the White House budget will focus on containing costs by reforming the Medicare payment system and reducing fraud and waste while maintaining the Traditional Medicare structure.

The president’s proposal will go up against the House Republican budget from House Budget Chairman Paul Ryan (R-Wis.), which advocates turning Medicare into a premium support system. Also in the running are the House and Senate Democratic budget proposals, which each have rejected any form of privatization in favor of building on the reforms in the Affordable Care Act (ACA).

During efforts to work out a deficit reduction deal with Republicans, Obama expressed a willingness to make significant changes to Medicare. The president has told House Republicans that he was open to combining Medicare coverage for hospitals and doctor services (Part A and Part B) in order to contain costs.

Obama’s plan to avoid sequestration cuts also hints at the Medicare changes that he’s willing to make. During negotiations to avoid the automatic spending cuts that kicked in March 1, the president suggested reducing overall health care spending by a total of $400 billion.

He plans to reduce payments to drug companies (for $140 billion in savings); reduce hospital payments for patients who don’t pay their bills ($30 billion); encourage efficient care after hospital stays ($50 billion); and encourage the use of high-value care while asking wealthier patients to pay more for their care ($35 billion).

Another $25 billion in savings would come from Medicaid; pay-for-delay (addressing drug industry deals that stall consumers’ access to cheaper generic drugs); program integrity; and the Independent Payment Advisory Board (IPAB), a panel created under the ACA to keep Medicare cost growth under control.

Stacy Sanders (federal policy director at the Medicare Rights Center), David Lipschutz (a Center for Medicare Advocacy policy attorney), and Paul Van de Water (a senior fellow specializing in Medicare at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities) predicted that when Obama issues a budget proposal, he will probably include the same Medicare spending provisions outlined in his 2013 budget.

Cato Institute Senior Fellow and entitlement reform expert Jagadeesh Gokhale also said he doesn’t expect major changes in the president’s Medicare reform approach, and predicts a focus on tax adjustments rather than on new spending reductions, considering recent health care cost projections. The Congressional Budget Office’s new budget outlook report, released earlier this month, decreased its 2020 Medicare spending estimate by $126 billion, taking into account slower-than-anticipated health care cost growth in recent years.

“I think [White House officials] are going to say that Medicare cost growth has been slower recently. It’s been only 2.9 or 3 percent a year since 2010 and therefore we need not take such strong measures on Medicare as might once have been thought to be necessary when the Medicare cost growth was in the range of 7 or 8 percent a year,” Gokhale said. “My guess is they will emphasize tax hike solutions. The obvious proposal they might have is to increase the Medicare payroll tax rate.”

Obama’s State of the Union address on Feb. 12 also seemed to indicate that he will be sticking to the same Medicare reform proposals. He called for “modest reforms” for Medicare and said he is in favor of reducing taxpayer subsidies to prescription drug companies, more cost-sharing for wealthy seniors (or expanded means-testing) and moving toward a pay-for-performance reimbursement strategy in order to reduce costs.

Obama 2013 Budget Priorities Likely to Remain

His 2013 budget proposal put these same ideas on the table. Opposing any form of premium support system, the president’s fiscal plan for 2013 focused on reforming the Medicare payment system and reducing fraud and waste while maintaining the Traditional Medicare structure.

Last year, the White House Office of Management and Budget estimated that the president’s suggested changes to Medicare, Medicaid and other health programs would save $364 billion over the next decade.

“The goal of these reforms is to make these critical programs more effective and efficient, and help make sure our health care system rewards high-quality medicine,” Obama wrote in his introduction to the 2013 budget. “What it does not do—and what I will not support—are efforts to turn Medicare into a voucher or Medicaid into a block grant. Doing so would weaken both programs and break the promise that we have made to American seniors, people with disabilities, and low-income families—a promise I am committed to keeping.”

In order to achieve that goal, the president proposed better aligning payments for graduate medical education and rural providers with actual patient costs, as well as reducing payments to providers for bad debts resulting from beneficiaries’ failure to pay deductibles or copayments.

He also suggested aligning Medicare drug payment policies with Medicaid policies for low-income beneficiaries, promoting efficient postacute care and increasing income-related premiums for Part B and Part D.

In last year’s budget, the president additionally planned to increase the Part B deductible by $25 for new beneficiaries in 2017, 2019 and 2021; to introduce home health copayments for new beneficiaries; to introduce a Part B premium surcharge for new beneficiaries who decide to purchase Medigap policies with low cost-sharing requirements; and to strengthen IPAB.

The budget also called for a solution to the flawed sustainable growth rate (SGR) formula, which lawmakers have overridden for years to prevent steep cuts to physician payments. The president additionally called for containment of costs stemming from chronic illnesses via expanded coverage for preventive services under the ACA.

Another major savings source for Medicare emphasized in the president’s 2013 budget is reducing fraud, waste and abuse. The proposal suggests that the government should authorize civil monetary penalties or other immediate sanctions on providers who don’t update enrollment records or exclude from the program providers affiliated with entities already sanctioned for fraud or other prohibited practices.

Finally, the president also called on lawmakers to affirm that Medicaid should be a last resort payer when other entities are legally liable for beneficiary claims and that Medicaid should rescreen 1.5 million home health agencies, medical equipment suppliers, doctors, hospitals and other providers for potential fraud.

What’s Already on the Table in the 2014 Budget Debate 

Ryan’s 2014 House Republican budget would balance the federal budget in a decade, cutting spending by $4.6 trillion through 2023. The budget preserves the $716 billion in Medicare spending reductions included in the ACA, although it would repeal the provisions of the law responsible for IPAB, subsidized insurance exchanges and the Medicaid expansion.

Like his previous budgets, Ryan’s latest proposal would transform Medicare into a premium support system. Beginning in 2024, Medicare beneficiaries would receive a “defined contribution,” or set amount of money, from the government with which to buy insurance. They could choose Traditional Medicare coverage or one of a range of competing private plans.

The fiscal year 2014 Senate budget resolution put forth by Senate Budget Committee Chairman Patty Murray (D-Wash.) would reduce the deficit by $1.85 trillion and includes $275 billion in health care cost cuts. This budget rejects the idea of premium support, stating that it would dismantle the Medicare program. The Senate budget calls for building on the reforms included in the ACA, which would involve further realignment of incentives, reducing waste and fraud and encouraging greater engagement to contain costs.

Similar to the Senate budget, the House Democratic 2014 budget proposal rejects the idea of turning Medicare into a premium support system, saying that it would shift the risks of rising health care costs onto beneficiaries. House Democrats propose $141 billion in Medicare spending reductions over the next decade; the budget would prevent Medicare cuts under sequestration and support the ACA reforms to the program.

Their proposal calls for achieving savings through efficiency improvements rather than through budget cuts. House Democrats support the cost containment provisions in the ACA as well as Obama’s proposal to give Medicare the same prescription drug rebates as Medicaid for low-income beneficiaries. Additionally, the House Democrats suggest enacting measures to reduce overpayments and correct misaligned incentives.

More from The Fiscal Times:

Please follow Politics on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

mf.gif

a2.imga2t.img

businessinsider?d=yIl2AUoC8zA businessinsider?i=BWh0Z5Ly4k4:ta5lWtq-H- businessinsider?i=BWh0Z5Ly4k4:ta5lWtq-H- businessinsider?d=qj6IDK7rITs businessinsider?i=BWh0Z5Ly4k4:ta5lWtq-H-
BWh0Z5Ly4k4

AAUP: Don't Cut Adjunct Hours To Avoid Obamacare Requirements

Colleges that reduce working hours for part-time instructors to avoid providing them health insurance coverage are under fire this week, even as they await guidance from the Internal Revenue Service on how best to credit such faculty for their time.

"We have been dismayed by news reports of a handful of colleges and universities that have threatened to cut the courseloads of part-time faculty members specifically in order to evade this provision of the law," a statement from the American Association of University Professors reads. "Such actions are reprehensible, penalizing part-time faculty members both by depriving them access to affordable health care as intended by law and by reducing their income."

Under a new Affordable Care Act provision going into effect in 2014, employees who work at least 30 hours a week are classified as full-time and entitled to employer-provided health insurance benefits.


Read More...
More on Education


raw_feed?d=yIl2AUoC8zA raw_feed?i=_y3bw4qbY6s:6xfjdD12bjQ:F7zBn raw_feed?i=_y3bw4qbY6s:6xfjdD12bjQ:V_sGL
_y3bw4qbY6s

Τετάρτη 3 Απριλίου 2013

10 Things Men Shouldn't Wear After 30

nike dunksAs you transition from your 20s into your 30s and beyond, your wardrobe may have to evolve.

There are just some style elements that you may have been able to pull off at a college party that you'll look ridiculous trying to pull off now. 

#10: Visors

Paul Rudd's character in Forgetting Sarah Marshall wore a visor. Why? Because he was an absolute dolt. If you're afraid of the sun getting in your eyes, go buy some sunglasses. No man should wear the same headgear that the guy who restocks the relish at Nathan's wears. And don't even get me started on wearing a visor backward. That's almost punishable by death.



#9: Ed Hardy Shirts

There is simply no justifiable excuse for a 30-year-old man to wear a T-shirt with a goddamn bedazzled dragon on it. Nothing says "Pathetically clinging to youth" quite like a middle-age man wearing Ed Hardy clothing. Remember a few years back when a post-divorce Jon Gosselin from Jon & Kate Plus 8 was, well, relevant? What was that dope wearing in damn near every paparazzi photo? That's right -- an awful, tacky, shiny, obnoxiously loud Ed Hardy T-shirt. Please, guys, the world doesn’t need another Jon Gosselin. In fact, I'm more or less positive that we didn't need the first one.



#8: Bright Sneakers

Adults can wear sneakers with colors on them. That's fine. We don't live in a black and white world. But there's just something about a 30-year-old guy wearing a pair of electric yellow sneakers with neon green laces that doesn't quite look right. Tone it down.



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

Please follow The Life on Twitter and Facebook.

mf.gif

a2.imga2t.img

businessinsider?d=yIl2AUoC8zA businessinsider?i=iFgJTMXDHJM:GuTYFsbL64 businessinsider?i=iFgJTMXDHJM:GuTYFsbL64 businessinsider?d=qj6IDK7rITs businessinsider?i=iFgJTMXDHJM:GuTYFsbL64
iFgJTMXDHJM

Here's A Chart That Shows Why LeBron James' Stats Don't Compare To Some Of The All-Time Greats

For many, it is difficult to accept how great LeBron James is because his statistics just don't compare to some of history's greatest players. However, James' deflated numbers can easily be explained by just looking at how slow the NBA has become.

Below is a look at how many shots teams averaged per game throughout the history of the NBA. For the last 20 years, the average has remained steady at approximately 81 shots per game. However, things were much different years ago.

For example, in 1961-62, the year Oscar Robertson famously averaged a triple-double, teams averaged 107.7 shots per game, the third-most in NBA history, and 31.5% more than this year (81.9 FGA/gm). If you increased James' numbers by the same rate, he would be averaging 35.4 points, 10.7 rebounds and 9.6 assists per game this year (Robertson averaged 30.8, 12.5, and 11.4 respectively).

This is not to diminish what Robertson accomplished. But his numbers do need to be taken in the context of a league that did not emphasize defense in the same manner as today's game. And when we do that we can see just how great LeBron is performing...

NBA Shots per game

Please follow Sports Page on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

mf.gif

a2.imga2t.img

businessinsider?d=yIl2AUoC8zA businessinsider?i=BH2nlyMalsE:GsMFcilwRP businessinsider?i=BH2nlyMalsE:GsMFcilwRP businessinsider?d=qj6IDK7rITs businessinsider?i=BH2nlyMalsE:GsMFcilwRP
BH2nlyMalsE

Κυριακή 31 Μαρτίου 2013

Tobias Dustin Summers Is Main Suspect In 10-Year-Old Girl Abduction Case

LOS ANGELES -- Police said Saturday they are looking for a transient in the kidnapping of a 10-year-old girl who was snatched from her San Fernando Valley home before dawn last week and abandoned hours later in front of a hospital.

Investigators identified 30-year-old Tobias Dustin Summers as a suspect in the case but couldn't elaborate on the motive or what led them to him. Police don't know if the girl was targeted but said they don't believe Summers had a connection to her family.


Read More...

raw_feed?d=yIl2AUoC8zA raw_feed?i=naBJF0zo8R4:5KeL89Hvw8k:F7zBn raw_feed?i=naBJF0zo8R4:5KeL89Hvw8k:V_sGL
naBJF0zo8R4

Τετάρτη 27 Μαρτίου 2013

The Feds Don't Seem to Understand Bitcoin


Bitcoin meets big brother


Last week, the Treasury Department's Financial Crimes
Enforcement Network (FinCEN) made waves in the
Bitcoin
community by releasing a statement
of guidance
 that paid special attention to virtual
currencies. Patrick Murck, who provides legal council to
Bitcoin.org and contributes to the foundation's blog, expressed concerns
about the implementation of the suggestions, which are being made
to the
Bank Secrecy Act
. 


Murck said he “was happy to see FinCEN issue some clarity around
the overly-broad pre-paid access rules and definitively state that
they do not apply in the context of bitcoin,” but he was also
pretty worried about the ill-fitting definitions FinCEN came up
with:



Left unsaid are any specifics around the facts and circumstances
that would constitute “engaging as a business.” [In reference to
the definitions of “User”, “Administrator” and
“Exchanger”] 




FinCEN’s guidance implies that every person who has ever had any
virtual currency and has ever exchanged that virtual currency for
real currency may now be considered a money transmitter under the
Bank Secrecy Act. That is, of course, an untenable
position. 




What is crystal-clear is that once a person sells a single
Satoshi for real currency that person is no longer a “User” and
therefore not categorically exempted from MSB registration.



Murck summarized the FinCEN guidance as follows: 


  • A person may spend money to purchase bitcoin or mine bitcoin
    and then exchange the currency for goods and/or services without
    having to register with FinCEN as an MSB.

  • If a person receives real money in exchange for their bitcoin
    they MAY have to register with FinCEN.

  • If a miner exchanges their mined bitcoin for real money they
    MUST register with FinCEN.

  • Anyone transacting bitcoin on someone else’s behalf MUST
    register with FinCEN. 

Murck also tried to calm businesses and individuals working
with the currency, noting that "under the Administrative Procedures
Act (APA), FinCEN can’t promulgate new rules without going through
a notice and comment proceeding whereby the public may have their
voices heard.”

Τρίτη 26 Μαρτίου 2013

Don't Freak Out If You See A B-52 Bomber Targeting Your Home

The following short video shows a&B-52 Stratofortress&during a standard training mission of the War Week, an exercise which incorporates Aerial Refueling, Weapons Tactics and High Altitude Maneuvering. The&iconic bomber&can be seen taking off, cruising, releasing simulated bombs, taking fuel midair from a&KC-135 Stratotanker&refueler and landing at Barksdale Air Force Base, Lousiana. As some viewers have noticed with a bit of concern on Youtube, the B-52 used what appears to be the garden of a civil house as the target of its simulated bombing run. Nothing special, to be honest: in order to improve the skills they may need one day against actual ones, aircrews of U.S. and foreign attack planes can use civilian buildings, infrastructures located inside or outside training areas and gunnery ranges. Buildings, bridges, highway passages can be used as simulated targets that a B-52 on a training sortie has to identify and attack&using&cruise missiles,&GPS&guided weapons, unguided munitions, mines and so on. Until they drop an actual bomb on them, civilians should not be too worried to be in the&B-52′s Radar Navigator crosshairs. More than 60 years after it started to fly with the U.S. Air Force, the B-52 is still being upgraded. The heavy bomber fleet will soon be equipped with the Sniper pod, that will enable a better integration with ground forces and provide improved precision in laser guided bomb air strikes. “This pod gives a faster response time to our targets. What would normally take me 30 to 40 button presses in five minutes now only takes me a few seconds to actually target and drop munitions,”&said Capt. Ryan Allen, 20th Bomb Squadron radar navigation instructor. Furthermore, the pod has a greater visibility range and can feed ground troops, to let them see what the Sniper pod sees. The Sniper pod already equips fast&combat jets&as well as the&B-1 Lancer,&and with a software upgrade called Net-T (network tactical) it can be turned into a wireless router that can provide connectivity to ground troops on the battlefield.